Access reviews
Nobody reads the spreadsheet. Oak reads the access.
Oak scopes every review to what matters, brings last use, peer comparison and a recommendation to each item, and keeps the evidence ready, so you're audit-ready any day, not once a quarter.
Book a demo →1,284 items to review. 1,190 are in use and match peers. Only 94 need a decision.
Resolved. 94 decided: 61 kept, 25 revoked, 8 downsized. Every decision on record, evidence ready to export.
What we hear
Reviews get signed. Nobody gets reviewed.
Snowflake admin
SF_PERM_8813
GitHub repo admin
APPROVEDEveryone rubber-stamps
Everyone rubber-stamps. It's a checkbox exercise, not a security one.
IAM director, airline
Reviewers can't tell
A lot of managers, they're clueless what their employee does.
Enterprise architect, technology
Volume without signal
I've got 3,000 to 5,000 user access reviews a year. I have extreme reservations that the folks reviewing these lists are actually giving it a thought.
Head of assurance, financial exchange
What changes
Same review. Now with the answer.
A spreadsheet tells reviewers what someone holds. Oak tells them whether it's used, whether peers hold it too, and what to do about it. Drag to compare.
Scope · Answer · Close · Prove
From quarterly scramble to audit-ready any day.
01
Review only what matters
Campaigns are scoped from your mined role model, so reviewers see what's relevant, not every entitlement that exists.
02
Every item brings the answer
Each item arrives with when it was last used, how many peers hold it, and a keep, revoke or downsize recommendation.
03
Decide it, and it's done
Revokes don't wait in a spreadsheet. Oak removes access directly where you grant write access, or through a ticket, and checks the app until it's gone.
04
Prove it any day
Evidence is generated the moment a campaign launches, and every decision, who made it and why, is on record. Export it any day, and the audit log streams to your SIEM.
StatusReady to launch| Item | Last used | Peers | Oak suggests |
|---|---|---|---|
| Snowflake admin | 2 hours ago | 9 of 9 | Keep |
| Salesforce modify all | Never | 0 of 9 | Revoke |
| GitHub repo admin | Yesterday | 2 of 9 | Downsize |
| Entra global reader | 140 days ago | 1 of 9 | Revoke |
| AWS billing read | 3 days ago | 8 of 9 | Keep |
| App | Permission | Person | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Salesforce | Modify all data | Tom Ortiz | Revoked |
| Entra ID | Global reader | Leo Park | Revoked |
| GitHub | Admin → write | Sara Kim | Downsized |
| Salesforce | SF_PERM_8813 | Ben Cole | Revoked |
See it in your estate
See your next review before your reviewers do.
Bring one campaign. We'll show you what's in use, what isn't, and the few decisions that actually need a person.
Book a demo →Why Oak
Reviews that mean something, every time.
Fewer reviews, each one meaningful
Campaigns are scoped from the mined role model, so reviewers certify only what's relevant.
Activity, not assumptions
No one else has an activity-based identity graph. Reviewers see what's used, not just what's granted.
It closes the loop
Revokes are done directly where you grant write access, or through Jira or ServiceNow.
Your team approves every change
Every decision is explained and on record, ready for the auditor.
“Speed, real-time signals, and meaningful time and risk savings in access review workflows are what make the value proposition compelling.”
IAM leader, fintech
Connects anything
Review every app. Not just the ones your IGA reached.
Oak brings cloud, SaaS, on-prem and homegrown apps into the same campaign. If it has identities inside, Oak reaches it.
And hundreds more, with new ones built in days.
Start with reviews. Keep going.
The same graph governs everything else.
The model that scopes your reviews also right-sizes access and governs your agents.
Questions, answered.
How does Oak decide what to recommend?
From real activity and peers. Each item shows when it was last used and how many people in the same role hold it, so the recommendation is based on what people do, not on entitlement names.
Do reviewers still make the call?
Yes. Oak recommends, and reviewers keep, revoke or downsize. Every decision, who made it and why, is on record.
What happens after a revoke?
Oak removes the access directly where you grant write access, or opens a ticket in Jira or ServiceNow, and checks the app until it's gone.
Do we need to replace our IGA?
No. Oak works alongside the IGA you run today, brings context into reviews, and covers the apps your IGA never onboarded.
What do we hand the auditor?
Evidence generated from the moment the campaign launches, plus a record of every decision with the reviewer, the reason and the time, ready to export. Oak also streams its audit log to your SIEM.
How do reviews get smaller?
With role mining, campaigns are scoped from the mined role model, so reviewers certify only what's relevant instead of every entitlement.
Stop the quarterly scramble. Be audit-ready any day.
Reviews scoped to what matters, every item with the answer, and evidence on record.
Book a demo →